[Federal Register: December 18, 1998 (Volume 63, Number 243)] [Rules and Regulations] [Page 69992-69994] From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov] [DOCID:fr18de98-2] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS 5 CFR Part 2635 RIN 3209-AA04 Standards of Ethical Conduct for Employees of the Executive Branch AGENCY: Office of Government Ethics (OGE). ACTION: Final rule; amendments. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY: The Office of Government Ethics is amending portions of the regulation governing standards of ethical conduct for executive branch employees which concern gifts from outside sources, to conform with interpretive advice and to improve clarity. EFFECTIVE DATE: January 19, 1999. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: G. Sid Smith, Senior Associate General Counsel, Office of Government Ethics; telephone: 202-208-8000; TDD: 202-208-8025; FAX: 202-208-8037. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On August 4, 1998, the Office of Government Ethics (OGE) published proposed minor amendments to the standards of ethical conduct for executive branch employees (5 CFR part 2635), to codify interpretive advice and clarify intended meaning in [[Page 69993]] subpart B (Gifts From Outside Sources). See 63 FR 41476-41477. No comments to that proposed rulemaking were received. Therefore, OGE is herewith publishing the proposed amendments as a final rule, with no changes, effective January 19, 1999. A summary of the amendments follows. Sections 2635.202 and 2635.203 of the standards of ethical conduct regulation, as promulgated for codification at 5 CFR part 2635 in 1992, implemented the general ban on soliciting or accepting gifts from certain prohibited sources and gifts given because of an employee's official position. The amendment to Sec. 2635.203(e) in this current rulemaking clarifies the meaning of gifts given because of the employee's official position, by revising the text and adding a new Example 2. The existing definition had been applied too broadly by some, in OGE's view, to encompass gifts based on mere happenstance that the recipient is a Government employee. The amended text and new example clarify that gifts given because of official position only describe those gifts which are motivated by the status, authority, or duties associated with the employee's Federal position. Section 2635.204 of the standards of ethical conduct regulation, as promulgated in 1992, established certain exceptions to the gift ban in Sec. 2635.202. The introductory text of existing Sec. 2635.204 notes that a gift accepted under one of the exceptions will not be deemed to violate the fourteen general principles of ethical behavior contained in Sec. 2635.101(b) and Executive Order 12674. Some ethics officials and employees had misunderstood the primary intent of this statement, which is that appearance concerns will not preclude use of the gift exceptions or require an employee to reject a gift which otherwise falls within one of the exceptions. The amendment to this text in the current rulemaking highlights the appearance standard as the primary principle among the fourteen that will not be deemed to override acceptance of a gift under one of the exceptions. This will further the original intent of promoting consistency in application of the gift rules, while recognizing that appearance concerns are already built into the various exceptions. A cautionary statement remains in the introductory text of Sec. 2635.204 as promulgated in 1992, to alert employees that it may sometimes be prudent not to accept gifts even though permitted, and Sec. 2635.202(c)(3) continues to limit the over- frequent acceptance of gifts that might appear to use public office for private gain. Section 2635.204(a) of the standards of ethical conduct regulation, as promulgated in 1992, provided an exception to the general gift ban, for gifts aggregating $20 or less ``per occasion.'' Some ethics officials and employees had been uncertain whether this meant that all gifts at a particular event must be aggregated, or only gifts from each source at that event. The amendment to the text of this section and new Example 5 clarify that the exception was intended to allow acceptance of gifts aggregating $20 or less ``per source per occasion.'' This would not, however, permit an employee to accept a gift worth more than $20 toward which several sources at an event or occasion have each contributed $20 or less, because a gift is not divisible for acceptance purposes unless it consists of distinct and separate items, as suggested in the remaining original text in Sec. 2635.204(a). Executive Order 12866 In promulgating these final rule amendments, the Office of Government Ethics has adhered to the regulatory philosophy and the applicable principles of regulation set forth in section 1 of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review. These amendments have also been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget under that Executive order. Regulatory Flexibility Act As Director of the Office of Government Ethics, I certify under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. chapter 6) that this rulemaking will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, because it primarily affects Federal executive branch agencies and their employees. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. chapter 35) does not apply, because this rulemaking does not contain any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget. List of Subjects in 5 CFR Part 2635 Conflict of interests, Executive branch standards of ethical conduct, Government employees. Approved: October 26, 1998. Stephen D. Potts, Director, Office of Government Ethics. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Office of Government Ethics is amending part 2635 of subchapter B of chapter XVI of title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as follows: PART 2635--[AMENDED] 1. The authority citation for part 2635 continues to read as follows: Authority: 5 U.S.C. 7301, 7351, 7353; 5 U.S.C. App. (Ethics in Government Act of 1978); E.O. 12674, 54 FR 15159, 3 CFR, 1989 Comp., p. 215, as modified by E.O. 12731, 55 FR 42547, 3 CFR, 1990 Comp., p. 306. 2. Section 2635.203 is amended by revising paragraph (e) and adding a new Example 2 after that paragraph to read as follows: Sec. 2635.203 Definitions. * * * * * (e) A gift is solicited or accepted because of the employee's official position if it is from a person other than an employee and would not have been solicited, offered, or given had the employee not held the status, authority or duties associated with his Federal position. * * * * * Example 2: Employees at a regional office of the Department of Justice (DOJ) work in Government-leased space at a private office building, along with various private business tenants. A major fire in the building during normal office hours causes a traumatic experience for all occupants of the building in making their escape, and it is the subject of widespread news coverage. A corporate hotel chain, which does not meet the definition of a prohibited source for DOJ, seizes the moment and announces that it will give a free night's lodging to all building occupants and their families, as a public goodwill gesture. Employees of DOJ may accept, as this gift is not being given because of their Government positions. The donor's motivation for offering this gift is unrelated to the DOJ employees' status, authority or duties associated with their Federal position, but instead is based on their mere presence in the building as occupants at the time of the fire. * * * * * 3. The undesignated introductory text of Sec. 2635.204 is amended by revising the first sentence to read as follows: Sec. 2635.204 Exceptions. The prohibitions set forth in Sec. 2635.202(a) do not apply to a gift accepted under the circumstances described in paragraphs (a) through (l) of this section, and an employee's acceptance of a gift in accordance with one of those paragraphs will be deemed not to violate the principles set forth in Sec. 2635.101(b), including appearances. * * * * * * * * 4. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 2635.204 is amended by adding the words ``per source'' before the words ``per occasion'' [[Page 69994]] in the first sentence, and by adding a new Example 5 after paragraph (a) to read as follows: Sec. 2635.204 Exceptions. * * * * * (a) * * * * * * * * Example 5: During off-duty time, an employee of the Department of Defense (DOD) attends a trade show involving companies that are DOD contractors. He is offered a $15 computer program disk at X Company's booth, a $12 appointments calendar at Y Company's booth, and a deli lunch worth $8 from Z Company. The employee may accept all three of these items because they do not exceed $20 per source, even though they total more than $20 at this single occasion. * * * * * [FR Doc. 98-33555 Filed 12-17-98; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6345-01-P