U. S. OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS
Fiscal Year 2008
Explanatory Notes
and
Annual Performance Plan
Prepared
for the
Committee on Appropriations
February 2007

February 4, 2008
The Honorable Robert Byrd
Chairman
Committee on Appropriations
U.S. Senate
The Capital, Room S-128
Washington, DC 20510-6025
The Honorable David R. Obey
Chairman
Committee on Appropriations
U.S. House of Representatives
The Capitol, Room H-218
Washington, DC 20515-6015
Dear Chairman Byrd and Chairman Obey:
I am pleased to transmit to you the Explanatory Notes and Annual Performance Plan of the Office of Government Ethics (OGE). The Explanatory Notes reflect funding for $13,000,000, and 80 full-time equivalents, as set forth in the President’s FY 2009 budget.
We will be pleased to discuss our request with representatives from your office. If you need additional information with regard to this request please contact Daniel D. Dunning, Deputy Director, Office of Administration and Information Resources Management, at 202-482-9203.
Sincerely,
/s/
Robert I. Cusick
Director
cc: (w/Encl.): The Honorable Richard J. Durbin
Chairman
Subcommittee on Financial Services
and General Government
Committee on Appropriations
U.S. Senate
184 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable Sam Brownback
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Financial Services
and General Government
Committee on Appropriations
U.S. Senate
127 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
The Honorable José Serrano
Chairman
Subcommittee on Financial Services
and General Government
Committee on Appropriations
U.S. House of Representatives
B-300, Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Ralph Regula
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Financial Services
and General Government
Committee on Appropriations
U.S. House of Representatives
1016 Longworth House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable John Conyers, Jr.
Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary
U.S. House of Representatives
2138 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Lamar S. Smith
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary
U.S. House of Representatives
2142 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Henry A. Waxman
Chairman
Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
2157 Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Thomas M. Davis, III
Ranking Member
Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform
U.S. House of Representatives
B-350A Rayburn House Office Building
Washington, DC 20515
The Honorable Joseph I. Lieberman
Chairman
Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs
U.S. Senate
340 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510-6250
The Honorable Susan M. Collins
Ranking Member
Committee on Homeland Security
and Governmental Affairs
U.S. Senate
344 Dirksen Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS OBJECT
CLASSIFICATION in (000’s)
2007 Actuals
11.1 Salaries $6,763
12.1 Civilian personnel benefits $1,663
21.0 Travel & Transportation/persons $100
22.0 Transportation of things $8
23.1 Rental payments to GSA $1,328
23.3 Communications, utilities, misc $20
24.0 Printing and Reproduction $48
25.2 Other Services $823
26.0 Supplies and materials $108
31.0 Equipment $109
Other Categories/CONV $89
99.0 Subtotal $11,059
99.0 Reimbursable $261___
99.9 Totals $11,320
2008 Appropriated
11.1 Salaries $7,430
12.1 Civilian personnel benefits $1,814
21.0 Travel & Transportation/persons $158
22.0 Transportation of things $5
23.1 Rental payments to GSA $1,341
23.3 Communications, utilities, misc $65
24.0 Printing and Reproduction $75
25.2 Other Services $695
26.0 Supplies and materials $75
31.0 Equipment $92
Other Categories/CONV $0
99.0 Subtotal $11,750
99.0 Reimbursable $400___
99.9 Totals $12,150
2009 Requested
11.1 Salaries $8,404
12.1 Civilian personnel benefits $2,020
21.0 Travel & Transportation/persons $158
22.0 Transportation of things $5
23.1 Rental payments to GSA $1,351
23.3 Communications, utilities, misc $65
24.0 Printing and Reproduction $75
25.2 Other Services $725
26.0 Supplies and materials $75
31.0 Equipment $122
Other Categories/CONV $0
99.0 Subtotal $13,000
99.0 Reimbursable $400___
99.9 Totals $13,400
OFFICE OF GOVERNMENT ETHICS RESOURCES BY OFFICE in (000's)
2007 ACTUALS
OFFICE: DIRECTOR
AMOUNT: $373
OFFICE: GENERAL COUNSEL & LEGAL POLICY
AMOUNT: $2,620
OFFICE: ADMINISTRATION & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
AMOUNT: $2,983
OFFICE: AGENCY PROGRAMS
AMOUNT: $4,555
OFFICE: INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE & GOVERNANCE INITIATIVES
AMOUNT: $528
Totals $11,059
Reimbursable Obligations(ANNUAL ETHICS CONFERENCE) - $261
Total $11,320
FTE: 71
2008 APPROPRIATED
OFFICE: DIRECTOR
AMOUNT: $425
OFFICE: GENERAL COUNSEL & LEGAL POLICY
AMOUNT: $2,825
OFFICE: ADMINISTRATION & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
AMOUNT: $3,080
OFFICE: AGENCY PROGRAMS
AMOUNT: $4,800
OFFICE: INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE & GOVERNANCE INITIATIVES
AMOUNT: $620
Totals $11,750
Reimbursable Obligations(ANNUAL ETHICS CONFERENCE) - $400
Total $12,150
FTE: 80
2009 REQUESTED
OFFICE: DIRECTOR
AMOUNT: $475
OFFICE: GENERAL COUNSEL & LEGAL POLICY
AMOUNT: $3,200
OFFICE: ADMINISTRATION & INFORMATION MANAGEMENT
AMOUNT: $3,325
OFFICE: AGENCY PROGRAMS
AMOUNT: $5,340
OFFICE: INTERNATIONAL ASSISTANCE & GOVERNANCE INITIATIVES
AMOUNT: $660
Totals $13,000
Reimbursable Obligations(ANNUAL ETHICS CONFERENCE) - $400
Total $13,400
FTE: 80
FY 2009 Explanatory Notes and
Performance Plan
Introduction
Public confidence in the integrity of Government
is one of the keys to the success of our democratic system. The mission of the Office of Government
Ethics (OGE) is directly linked to strengthening that confidence by fostering
high ethical standards for executive branch employees and by ensuring that the
Government’s business is conducted with impartiality and integrity.
OGE’s budget request for FY 2009 of $13,000,000
will allow it to fulfill its role during a critical period for our Government:
assisting the smooth transition to a new Presidential Administration. This period traditionally is one of peak
activity for OGE. During this time, OGE
focuses its efforts on helping to review the incoming Administration’s nominees
for conflicts of interest, advising new and outgoing employees of their ethics
obligations, and training ethics officials in executive branch agencies on the
skills they will need to meet their responsibilities.
Highlights
for FY 2007
FY 2007 was the first year of
OGE’s new five-year Strategic Plan. Last
year’s budget document outlined how OGE would meet those new objectives during
the first two years of that Plan. OGE
announced that it would undertake initiatives to support three main priorities
in FY 2007 and FY 2008, and OGE made substantial progress during FY 2007 in all
three areas:
The successful planning and
delivery of the 15th National Government Ethics Conference (National
Conference) was another significant undertaking for OGE in FY 2007. The conference’s agenda provided a major
opportunity to address OGE’s priorities. The National Conference was comprised of workshops organized into six
themed tracks, with one track devoted to emerging issues. The track included several workshops on contractor
ethics issues. Another track focused on
preparing for the next transition and offered sessions on topics such as
reviewing nominee financial disclosure reports and what ethics officials need
to know about the transition process. At
the National Conference, OGE’s Director introduced a Leadership Initiative to
the ethics community. This effort was
initiated in FY 2007 to engage the leadership of Federal departments and
agencies in developing and supporting an ethical culture in the executive
branch.
Finally, in FY 2007, OGE played
an important role in the
Priorities
for FY 2008 and FY 2009
OGE’s priorities for FY 2008 and FY 2009
are described in detail in the FY 2009 performance plan set out below. They reflect the upcoming two years of
activities that will move OGE toward achieving the goals in the second and
third years of its five-year strategic plan. These goals are: (1) strengthening the ethical culture within
the executive branch, (2) preventing conflicts of interest, and (3) promoting
good governance. Under the Director’s
leadership, OGE plans to undertake a variety of initiatives to support the
following three key priorities in FY 2008 and FY 2009:
·
Assisting in the transition to a new
Administration. This will be OGE’s primary focus during this
timeframe. OGE plans to complete the actions contained in its comprehensive
transition plan in FY 2008 and early FY 2009, to prepare itself and ethics
officials in the executive branch agencies to handle the anticipated surge in
public and confidential financial disclosure reports during the transition as
well as the ethics issues faced by outgoing and incoming Administration
officials. OGE intends to finalize new
rules such as those on post-employment restrictions and blind trusts, issue
additional guidance for ethics officials on key topics, and provide training
for reviewers of nominee reports. A
·
Engaging agency leadership in developing and
supporting an ethical culture. OGE will continue its efforts to meet with
agency leaders to raise awareness of the importance and needs of agency ethics
programs. OGE will also use its program
reviews to identify model practices for use by other agencies, and to identify
how agency leaders can support their ethics officials in moving beyond a
program of basic compliance with ethics requirements. OGE will also develop a training program on
ethical leadership specifically for agency leaders and will prepare ethics
materials for the many new appointees who enter the Government as part of the
incoming Administration in FY 2009.
·
Using technology to improve the delivery of
ethics services, information, and materials. If resources permit, OGE
plans to increase its use of technology to deliver training to ethics officials
through such means as web-based seminars, CD-ROMs, and videos in FY 2009. Although these mechanisms will never replace
face-to-face training, they will allow OGE to reach a wider audience in a
cost-effective manner, particularly during a period in which many new ethics
officials will come on board as part of the new Administration.
FY 2009 Budget Request Overview
OGE’s
total budget request for FY 2009 is $13,000,000. This funding level will allow OGE to add
needed staff for the upcoming Presidential transition, a critical period for OGE
during which its workload will be substantially increased. OGE’s request will permit it to handle the
expected surge in nominee financial disclosure reports filed by the incoming
President’s nominees for high-level positions requiring Senate
confirmation. It also will enable OGE to
provide the necessary training and guidance for new and experienced ethics
officials so that they will be able to handle the ethics issues that arise
during the transition period.
FY 2007 Results
Strategic Goal One: Strengthening Ethical
Culture Within the Executive Branch
Objective 1.1: Improving the Effectiveness of
Ethics Policy
In FY 2007, OGE began to prepare for the
Presidential transition that will take place in FY 2008 and FY 2009. As an initial step, OGE developed a
comprehensive plan for identifying and updating guidance relevant to the
transition, including guidance for officials leaving the current
Administration. OGE’s first new policy
memorandum in support of this goal addressed the issue of whether, and under
what circumstances, an executive branch employee may assist someone in seeking
a job in the private sector. During FY
2007, OGE also began the process of training its newer employees on topics that
are particularly relevant to the transition, such as the rules applicable to
seeking employment and post-employment activities and financial disclosure.
As part of OGE’s effort to continually review
and update policy guidance for ethics officials, OGE published a number of
comprehensive memoranda providing advice on key questions. These memoranda, which are provided to agency
ethics officials and are available to the public on OGE’s website, discussed
issues such as the ethics rules that apply to detailees under the
Intergovernmental Personnel Act, gifts of admission to events, and Government
employees asked to serve as expert witnesses. The memoranda also provided guidance on issuing conflict of interest
waivers to employees, counting days of service for special Government
employees, and determining what is a “matter” for purposes of the ethics
rules. In FY 2007, 93 percent of ethics
officials surveyed said that OGE policy guidance was useful.
One of the emerging issues in which OGE has
been active is the area of contractor ethics. Because an increasing number of contractor employees are assigned to
work in Federal buildings alongside Federal employees, ethics issues that arise
from working in such close proximity continue to raise concerns. In January 2007, the Acquisition Advisory
Panel released its final report on Federal contracting to the OMB and
Congress. The report adopted several
recommendations by OGE regarding the need for executive branchwide ethics rules
on contractors in the Federal workplace.
In a related development, OGE submitted
comments on proposed rules prepared by the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council that would establish certain
ethics requirements for Federal contractor employees. OGE also advised the Government
Accountability Office (GAO) on its inquiry into ethics issues involving
contractors in the Department of Defense. In addition, OGE launched an online training course specifically for
contractor employees. The course is
designed to inform contractors about the rules that apply to Government
employees and to alert contractor employees to avoid conduct that might trigger
an inadvertent ethics violation.
Another emerging ethics issue addressed by
OGE in FY 2007 was the impact of alternative pay systems on financial
disclosure requirements. OGE previously
had conducted a survey of agencies that have implemented non-standard pay
systems (e.g., other than the GS or SES systems) to determine how the agencies
were deciding who was required to file a public financial disclosure
report. OGE determined that, generally,
agencies were adequately addressing financial disclosure, and OGE issued advice
to assist those agencies who were still dealing with the issue. OGE exceeded
its FY 2007 goal for the percentage of ethics officials who rate OGE as
responsive to emerging ethics program issues.
In addition, since January 2007, Congress has
considered several pieces of legislation affecting Government ethics laws. OGE has closely tracked the development of
these proposals and has provided technical assistance regarding the impact of
these proposals on the existing executive branch program. OGE also has responded to Congressional and
OMB requests for comment on draft bills, legislation, bill reports and
testimony. Specifically, OGE timely completed 169 OMB requests for review and
comment in FY 2007 with OGE’s comments on direct ethics issues incorporated 97
percent of the time. This represents a
48 percent increase in the number of requests for review over FY 2006 (114) and
a 31 percent increase over FY 2005 (129). The percentage of OGE’s comments incorporated on direct ethics issues
also increased from 89 percent in FY 2005 and FY 2006 to 97 percent in FY 2007.
Objective
1.2: Enhance Assistance to and Oversight of Agency Ethics Programs
In March 2007 OGE hosted its National
Conference, providing a major opportunity to address OGE’s priorities. Almost
600 ethics officials from 85 agencies or components of executive branch
departments located at headquarters and regional offices, participated in the
three-and-a-half day conference. In
addition, representatives from the Inspector General (IG) community and civil
society organizations participated. National Conference participants attended workshops organized into six
themed tracks, including tracks devoted to leadership, emerging issues, and
preparation for the Presidential transition following the general election in
November 2008.
For the first time, all conference materials
were available in electronic format and distributed to participants on flash
drives, thus enabling participants to refer easily to the information after the
conference and providing an archive for future course development.
At the National Conference OGE launched two
initiatives, both developed by OGE in FY 2007. The “Leadership Initiative” focused on the critical role of high-level
agency leadership in promoting an ethical culture. The “Compliance Plus” initiative focused on
ensuring integrity in Government decision making processes and the overall
fostering of public confidence in Government. Under “Compliance Plus” an
ethical culture is created by emphasizing the need for agencies to maintain
effective ethics programs by establishing and meeting goals beyond minimum
compliance with statutory and regulatory requirements. The initiatives were created as a result of
close coordination with the ethics community. OGE’s Director introduced the
Leadership Initiative in the conference’s keynote address.
Because leadership support is a critical
component of a successful agency ethics program, OGE is committed to raising
the level of discourse between the leadership of executive branch agencies and
the ethics community. As part of the
Leadership Initiative, OGE developed and provided to agencies suggestions for
concrete actions that can be implemented at the leadership level to enhance
agency ethics programs.
The Compliance Plus approach enhances OGE’s
program review process by emphasizing the goal of identifying and sharing model
practices. Model practices serve to improve the processes and systems necessary
to achieve compliance requirements, thus freeing up ethics program resources. Model practices assist ethics officials in
setting comprehensive performance targets for their programs. As emphasized under “Compliance Plus,” an
ethics program that strives only to meet the basic requirements is missing an
opportunity to more fully advance agencies overall ethical culture. The
approach also encourages cooperative work among ethics offices to establish
benchmarks over time to facilitate program assessments.
OGE took additional steps to leverage the
resources of the ethics community. First, OGE convened various focus groups to discuss its Leadership Initiative
and to promote wider access to and use of training products that received
awards at the National Conference. Second, OGE instituted lunch-time forums to focus on the emerging issue
of the upcoming transition and enhance program management. Third, OGE continued to forge a stronger
relationship with regional ethics officials and the IG community by including
topics of interest to them in the conference agenda.
OGE also focused on Presidential transition
issues as part of its efforts to enhance assistance to agency ethics officials
in FY 2007. For example, OGE offered a
presentation at its National Conference on book deals by executive branch
officials. OGE expects to issue written
guidance on this topic in FY 2008. In
FY 2007, OGE also began training additional staff to review financial
disclosure reports. This action was
taken in anticipation of a significant surge in the volume of reports filed by
Presidential nominees for positions requiring Senate confirmation during the
Presidential transition following the general election in November 2008. The National Conference also included an OGE
presentation urging executive branch agencies to begin preparations for this
upcoming Presidential transition by training additional reviewers of financial
disclosures.
OGE worked on several issues in connection
with tax matters related to ethics programs. In order to assist executive branch agencies in requesting Certificates
of Divestiture (which allow employees to defer capital gains taxes on assets
they are required to divest), OGE issued a DAEOgram describing the processing
of such requests and developed a draft recommended format for requests. OGE provided technical advice to officials
from the Supreme Court and the Administrative Office of the United States
Courts regarding draft rules they had created to implement a newly authorized
judicial branch program for Certificates of Divestiture. OGE also worked with officials of the
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to develop IRS regulations regarding the tax
treatment of accelerated payments under deferred compensation plans pursuant to
26 U.S.C. § 409A, when such payments are accelerated as a means
of complying with Governmental ethics requirements.
In FY 2007, OGE also continued to provide
strong liaison services to ethics officials in executive branch departments and
agencies through the OGE desk officer program and the random call desk. Desk officers delivered timely, accurate, and
consistent guidance to executive branch ethics officials on a wide range of
ethics issues, from answering questions about conflicts of interest and other
ethics rules to identifying model practices and programs in other agencies and
offering suggestions for improving program operations. In addition, numerous
complex legal and policy questions were answered by OGE attorneys. OGE also continued its efforts to enhance
individual agency programs and the ethics community as a whole through its
identification, development and dissemination of model practices.
OGE provided quality ethics education and
training to over one thousand agency ethics officials in FY 2007, in addition
to the training provided during the National Conference. To measure the
effectiveness of the training, OGE administered an assessment tool during the
training. The results: 100 percent of responding ethics officials indicated
that their knowledge of, and ability to apply, ethics laws and rules increased
as a result of the training they received. Using feedback provided by
ethics officials who attended OGE training and from the instructors, as well as
observations made by the instructional designers, OGE revised certain courses
to ensure that they are up-to-date and effective. To further ensure the accuracy and quality of
its products, OGE expanded the formal internal review and approval process for
course materials. OGE also developed
numerous job aids -- e.g., flow charts, timelines, and summaries -- to help
ethics officials perform their jobs. Copies of these job aids were distributed to ethics officials either as
part of ethics training or upon request.
In FY 2007, OGE launched a new award program
to recognize agency educational achievements, and invited ethics officials to
submit their best training products. OGE
selected the 10 most effective agency ethics training programs, from more than
60 entries, and met with representatives of the agencies that developed the
products to discuss how to leverage the programs for use by all executive
branch agencies.
OGE conducted onsite reviews of 24 ethics
programs at executive branch departments and agencies in order to:
(1) identify and report on strengths and weaknesses of the programs; (2)
make specific recommendations for program enhancements; (3) provide
technical assistance to agencies; (4) identify and share model practices;
(5) provide guidance on correcting deficiencies and implementing specific
recommendations and suggestions; and (6) promote the goal of reaching
beyond mere compliance with regulatory standards. OGE’s program reviews continued to emphasize
the importance of having written procedures for following up with delinquent
financial disclosure filers. OGE also
conducted six-month follow-up reviews to address recommendations and
suggestions made in its reports. Through
discussions with ethics officials and examination of relevant documentation,
OGE determines whether appropriate practices and procedures are in place to
provide reasonable assurances that the identified program weaknesses are
appropriately addressed.
OGE completed a special project at the
Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) providing the Department of Homeland
Security, FEMA and OGE leadership with suggestions to enhance the overall
effectiveness of the FEMA ethics program. The project arose from FEMA’s
interest in working informally with OGE to examine and improve its program
outside the structure of routine onsite review.
OGE administered surveys to evaluate agency
ethics programs and establish baseline data for OGE’s FY 2007-2011 strategic
plan. OGE developed and used a newly
designed survey -- administered to ethics officials throughout the
approximately 130 departments and agencies of the executive branch -- to assess
the effectiveness of the services and support provided by OGE and to help
establish benchmarks for performance measures defined in the strategic plan.
OGE also administered surveys to measure employees' perceptions of their
agencies’ ethical culture and ethics program.
Objective 1.3: Increase
Employee Awareness of Their Ethics Responsibilities
OGE finalized improvements to the
confidential financial disclosure reporting system in FY 2007. OGE issued a new reporting form to be used by
approximately 300,000 employees. The
form was designed to be completed electronically, although paper submission is
still required. OGE implemented changes
in the system that included a new reporting date (February 15) and a new
reporting period (calendar year), as well as streamlined reporting requirements. OGE launched an online training course for
confidential filers to acquaint them with the new reporting requirements and
form, and provided a set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) that confidential
filers can access through the OGE website. OGE has received strong positive feedback from ethics officials on the
improvements in this form. The FAQs were
also one of the website’s most frequently viewed sections.
As exemplified by the training materials
related to financial disclosure, OGE plays an important role in preparing
training materials that can either be used by agencies as issued or modified
for agency-specific needs. While
individual departments and agencies prepare much of the training information
distributed to their staffs, OGE-produced materials reduce the time and
resources that agencies would otherwise have to spend in producing their own
training. For example, in support of
OGE’s efforts to emphasize ethics issues that result from the Government’s
increasing use of contractors, OGE issued: (1) a brochure that outlines
ethics rules for Government employees who are primarily involved in contracting
and procurement activities, and (2) an online training course for
Government employees who work with contractors on a frequent basis. OGE launched another online course that
explains how the ethics rules apply to special Government employees (SGEs)
(i.e., temporary or intermittent employees who work for 130 days or less). This course is expected to be particularly
useful to members of Federal advisory committees.
OGE expanded its use of low-cost technology
to deliver ethics training and information to Federal employees and ethics
officials in FY 2007. Many of its
training products are available on its website. Here are some creative ways OGE presented ethics information in FY 2007,
in addition to the web‑based courses described above:
Objective
1.4: Increase OGE’s Focus on Senior Officials’ Roles in Implementing Ethics
Program
OGE's Director introduced the Leadership
Initiative to the broader ethics community at the National Conference. The initiative provides agency leaders with
suggestions for concrete actions that they can implement to fulfill their ethics
responsibilities. Leadership support is
a critical component of a successful agency ethics program. OGE is committed to
raising the level of discourse between the leadership of executive branch
agencies and the ethics community. To
achieve this goal, OGE consulted with several sources to identify specific
steps that agency leaders could institute to promote an ethical culture, and to
support an agency’s ethics program. OGE
worked closely with the Department of the Interior, which developed a
comprehensive program to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and to
underscore their Secretary’s commitment to establishing an ethical culture
throughout the Department.
The theme was
further reinforced by the Secretary of the Department of the Interior, who was
a keynote speaker at OGE’s National Conference. The leadership theme also was
interwoven into all of the presentation streams of the conference. The Leadership Initiative continued after the
conference with a series of working groups of ethics officials to discuss
strategies to engage agency leadership and implement effective leadership
actions.
OGE instituted a practice of inviting
agency leadership to meet with OGE’s leadership in connection with ethics
program reviews. In addition to promoting
the importance of the ethics program, this practice serves to help ensure
personal commitment to the program by agency leadership as well as to define
and allocate sufficient agency resources for the program. OGE’S Director met with several high-level
agency leaders, including the Secretaries or other top officials of
cabinet-level and other executive branch agencies that were scheduled for
onsite reviews in FY 2007: the
Department of Agriculture, the Department of Education, the Department of the
Interior, the Federal Trade Commission and the Pension Benefits Guaranty
Corporation. As a result, several
agencies have implemented or are developing plans to improve their ethics
programs. These improvements include
ensuring the ethics programs are optimally located within the organizational
hierarchy to most effectively carry out agency ethics responsibilities. Restructuring of the ethics program has
resulted in a direct reflection of commitment of the organizations leadership
to the ethics program objectives.
Strategic Goal Two: Preventing Conflicts of
Interest
Objective
2.1: Enhance Assistance to the President and Congress in the Presidential
Appointment Process
In preparation for the
Presidential transition, OGE began assessing the training needs of individual
agencies on the review of public financial disclosure reports. In the course of reviewing nominee reports in
FY 2007, OGE scrutinized the work of agency ethics officials and met internally
to discuss the issues that were arising in the course of these reviews. Also, OGE’s financial disclosure team and
program reviewers met to discuss specific issues with agency programs in
connection with the review of financial disclosure reports. Based on this assessment, OGE will continue
in FY 2008 to provide agency reviewers with guidance and instruction that will
improve their review of public financial disclosure reports.
During FY 2007, OGE reviewed and certified
252 financial disclosure reports submitted by nominees to positions requiring
Senate conformation. In addition, OGE
worked more closely with ethics officials to provide guidance on ethics
agreements for nominees to resolve the nominees’ potential conflicts of
interest. Heightened scrutiny of the
quality of these ethics agreements increased the emphasis on resolving
conflicts prospectively. In order to
build the skills of agency ethics officials, OGE contacted agency ethics
officials directly to explain and negotiate changes to their nominees’ ethics agreements. In FY 2007, 98 percent of filers complied
with their ethics agreements within the required time frame.
OGE also has developed draft written guidance
on ethics agreements as a supplement to OGE’s financial disclosure guidance
manual, Financial Disclosure: A
Reviewer’s Reference. OGE will issue
a final version of this guidance in FY 2008.
In addition, several presentations at OGE’s
National Conference addressed both technical disclosure issues and substantive
conflicts issues related to nominee financial disclosure. OGE also conducted training for new financial
disclosure reviewers in
In OGE’s FY 2008 budget request, OGE
indicated that it intended to convert its Financial
Disclosure: A Reviewer’s Reference to a primarily electronic format so that
it could be timely updated to respond to emerging trends in financial
arrangements. The guide is currently
available on OGE’s website in HTML and PDF versions. OGE had planned in FY 2007 to convert this
document to a new format that would be easier to update. However, OGE lacked the financial resources
to accomplish the technological steps necessary to complete this task.
OGE submitted a proposed regulation on
qualified blind trusts and qualified diversified trusts to DOJ and OPM for
review. This proposed regulation revises
existing regulations in order to clarify the process for establishing such
trust instruments. OGE had hoped to
issue the proposed regulation in FY 2007, but a staffing shortage in 2007
delayed its issuance. After the review
process is completed, OGE will adopt a final regulation on its trust program
before the beginning of the Presidential transition.
In FY 2007, OMB informed OGE that its request to undertake an OMB-sanctioned e‑Gov Initiative for the development of an electronic system for financial disclosure reports in the executive branch would not be approved. OGE considered the possibility of attempting to manage an informal non-OMB sanctioned e‑Gov Initiative, but rejected that approach because OGE has neither the finances nor staff resources to oversee such a challenging effort of a strictly voluntary nature without definite funding sources. Alternatively, OGE decided to allow each agency to undertake its own development of an electronic filing process to use with either the public (Standard Form (SF) 278) or confidential (OGE Form 450) reporting system
Even though each department or agency will decide its own progression into the
electronic filing arena, the integrity of financial disclosure processes will continue to be one of OGE’s highest priorities. Accordingly, OGE will take the following steps: (1) continue to monitor the executive branch’s movement into this area by requesting basic information on future surveys; (2) be a member of the “Electronic Filing Workgroup” formed late in FY 2007 to promote the development and advancement of executive branchwide electronic financial disclosure report filing; and (3) oversee agency electronic filing efforts as part of its Program Review Division’s future reviews of agency ethics programs.
Accordingly, OGE provided assistance to
executive branch agencies that are developing electronic financial disclosure
systems. OGE communicated with agencies
regarding plans and requirements for such systems in a DAEOgram, at a special
meeting of Designated Agency Ethics Officials, and at OGE’s National
Conference. OGE’s staff provided
feedback to the Army, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the
Federal Aviation Administration regarding electronic filing formats they had
developed. OGE also provided evaluations
of the legal sufficiency of frequently asked questions and screen instructions
that the Army had developed in connection with its electronic filing system.
Objective
2.2: Monitor Continued Compliance With Conflict of Interest Laws
In FY 2007, OGE continued to identify and
address executive branch compliance with annual financial disclosure report
requirements and ethics agreements. During the fiscal year, over 900 Presidentially appointed, Senate
confirmed (PAS) SF 278 annual and termination reports were filed with OGE for
its final review and certification. During this process, OGE worked with agencies to ensure that the reports
were technically accurate and conflict free. In addition, OGE strengthened its monitoring system to ensure that
reports are filed as quickly as possible. As a result, OGE experienced an 8 percent increase in reports
that did not require a filing extension. OGE also analyzed the quality of the reviews performed at the agency
level. This analysis will serve as the
focus of a targeted program review in FY 2008.
OGE also continued its monitoring of ethics
agreements of PAS officials. During this
fiscal year, OGE monitored a total of 212 agreements made by 127 PAS
officials. Because of OGE’s strict follow-up
procedures, 98 percent of all required actions were completed within the
standard initial period of 90 days.
In FY 2007, OGE program reviewers routinely
emphasized the importance of notifying public filers once their reports had
been reviewed and certified. In those
cases where reports had not been certified or were certified late due to filing
errors or inconsistencies, OGE program reviewers ensured that agency officials
were making efforts to collect or correct the information that was delaying certification.
In addition, OGE’s reviews of agency ethics
programs identified and reported on systemic weaknesses that led to the late
submission and review of annual and termination public financial disclosure
reports. OGE has recommended a variety
of strategies that agencies could use to correct these weaknesses,
including: utilizing human resources
officials to ensure that the ethics office is timely notified of incoming,
incumbent, and departing filers; including the filing requirement in filers’ position
descriptions; and foregoing raises or promotions for those employees who are
delinquent in filing.
IGs provide critical support to the
enforcement of ethics laws and rules, as they usually conduct the primary
investigations of alleged violations. Therefore,
OGE seeks opportunities to strengthen the relationship between IGs and the
ethics community and to help IGs understand the application of the ethics
requirements. For example, OGE provided
IGs with training on the review of public financial disclosure reports and
provided a briefing on the OGE program review process. In addition, OGE staff consulted regularly
with IG offices to advise them on ongoing investigations.
Objective
2.3: Administer an Effective Confidential Financial Disclosure System
OGE made improvements to the confidential
financial disclosure process through the issuance of new rules and a new form
that streamlines the reporting requirements. In addition, OGE continued to encourage and approve the use of
alternative confidential financial disclosure procedures to permit agencies to
obtain information about specific kinds of financial interests that can present
conflicts for their employees. In FY
2007, OGE approved the use of alternative confidential financial disclosure
procedures for the Department of the Army, the Department of Justice, the
Defense Science Board, the Inter-American Foundation, the President’s Foreign
Intelligence Advisory Board, and the Office of Thrift Supervision. Finally, during the course of its onsite evaluations
of agency ethics programs, OGE ensured that previously approved alternative
procedures were being administered in compliance with the plan approved by OGE.
Strategic
Goal Three: Promoting Good Governance
Objective
3.1 Increase OGE’s Support of and Cooperation With Federal, State and Local Agencies
Implementing Programs That Help Support Good Governance
In FY 2007 OGE engaged in a number of
activities with Federal, State and local agencies that promote integrity,
accountability, and transparency in Government. At the Federal level, OGE’s
Director maintained consistent communication with the IG community through
regular attendance at the President’s Council on Integrity and Efficiency’s
(PCIE) and the Executive Council on Integrity and Efficiency’s (ECIE) monthly
meetings. The Director continued to
serve on the PCIE Integrity Committee and was a featured speaker at the 2007
PCIE/ECIE Conference.
OGE also maintained a consistent presence at
the Federal Interagency Ethics Council, an informal group of executive branch
ethics officials who meet monthly to share model practices and practical
information. In support of the
substantial number of federal advisory committees, OGE staff participated
in a multi-day curriculum development exercise held by the General Services
Administration to improve training for Federal Advisory Committee management
officers in Departments and agencies.
At the State and local level, OGE continued
to be an active member of the Council on Governmental Ethics Laws (COGEL), an
organization of Federal, State and local government agencies primarily from the
Throughout FY 2007, OGE coordinated
extensively with Federal, State and local government agencies in conjunction
with
OGE engaged in programs and projects with
more Federal, State and local agencies than projected for FY 2007. Although it was difficult to obtain written,
qualitative feedback, these agencies indicated, in discussions with OGE, that
they found their interactions with OGE to be useful.
Objective
3.2: Enhance Outreach to the Public and Private Sector and Civil Society
OGE continued to serve the
public effectively by providing timely and thorough responses to public
requests for information relating to public financial disclosure reports and
the semi-annual reports of travel payments accepted from non-Federal sources,
as well as queries from the general public handled through its call desk
system. To enhance general public access
to information about the agency and the executive branch ethics program, OGE
also continued to work with the Government Printing Office to refine OGE's
website design and to modernize the features of the site.
The Director and other members of the staff
made numerous presentations in FY 2007 to private sector and civil society
organizations whose understanding of the Federal ethics program would help
support public trust in Government. The
audiences included non-Government organizations, professional and business
associations and educational institutions. The OGE Director and his staff specifically reached out to organizations
OGE wished to engage in a dialogue on key emerging issues. For example, the Director spoke to the
Defense Industry Initiative, a coalition of major defense contractors on the
ethics issues of contractors in the Federal workplace. Others in OGE made presentations to
organizations such as the Public Contracts section of the American Bar
Association, a large group of private-sector companies who market products and
services to the Government, and a national association of scientists. Overall, these interactions resulted in
consistently positive responses.
Objective
3.3: Support
OGE’s provision of ethics program expertise
and an understanding of an ethics program’s role in good governance have had an
appreciable and positive effect on the recipients of
OGE served as a primary representative of the
United States Government at the plenary meeting of the Council of Europe’s
Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) during the consideration and
adoption of the second round evaluation report on the United States; continued
to represent the United States at GRECO meetings throughout the year; and was
selected to continue to serve as expert evaluators of other GRECO members
during the third round of evaluations which will begin in FY 2008.
The United Nations Convention Against
Corruption has been and continues to be a priority
Throughout FY 2007, OGE provided expertise in
a number of initiatives of other international organizations in which the
OGE continued to serve as a